In this article
Instant comprehensionNovelty and its decayFormats that keep workingSustaining after the novelty fadesWe run this calculation for brands weekly, so the numbers here come from campaigns rather than from a blog roundup.
The buyers approving your invoice scroll the same feeds as everyone else, and reaching them there costs a fraction of reaching them in a B2B ad auction.
Instant comprehension
Whatever you decide here, write down the baseline first. Branded search volume, direct traffic and blended acquisition cost, measured before anything changes, are what make the result legible later.
Software companies are usually sitting on more distributable content than they realise — demos, webinars, podcast appearances and conference talks that were recorded once and then never left the platform they were recorded on.
Novelty and its decay
The account doing the posting matters more than most teams accept. A mediocre clip on an established account will out-reach an excellent clip on a cold one, reliably.
The buyers approving your invoice scroll the same feeds as everyone else, and reaching them there costs a fraction of reaching them in a B2B ad auction.
Rule of thumb: if you cannot state what a verified view means in your contract, you are not buying reach — you are buying a number someone else controls.
Formats that keep working
In practice this is a volume question before it is a creative question. Six posts tell you nothing; four hundred tell you which hook family works and which was a coincidence.
Acquisition costs in software have risen every year for a decade, which is why organic short-form has moved from experiment to line item.
- Establish the baseline before you change anything: branded search, direct traffic, blended acquisition cost.
- Run enough volume in the first thirty days to distinguish a format from a coincidence.
- Cut the bottom third of formats hard, and put the freed budget behind the top third.
- Judge downstream effects on a four to eight week lag, not inside a seven-day attribution window.
Sustaining after the novelty fades
Every platform now demotes reposted and watermarked material, so anything that looks recycled across channels quietly loses distribution before a human ever sees it.
Software companies are usually sitting on more distributable content than they realise — demos, webinars, podcast appearances and conference talks that were recorded once and then never left the platform they were recorded on.
The numbers we work from
| Metric | Benchmark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Clips per hour of source | 20–60 | Depends on density of the source material |
| Clips surviving full selection | 1 in 38 | ~97% destroyed before publication |
| Programme entry point | $5,000/mo | Priced on selection, not impressions |
| Time from file to live | 24–72 hours | Sub-15 minutes on retainer for live moments |
| Minimum useful budget | $5,000 | Below this there is not enough volume to learn from |
| First reliable read | 30 days | Downstream lift typically 4–8 weeks behind |
The short version
None of this is complicated. It is just operationally heavy, which is exactly why it stays a competitive advantage for the brands willing to run it properly.
If you want this modelled against your own category and budget, a call takes thirty minutes and gives you a price, a campaign outline and a launch date — whether or not you buy anything.
Want this run for you? Vanguard turns one video into thousands of clips, reviews every one by hand, and posts the best on the network.
Book a scope call →